GENETIC ENGINEERING: EFFECTS
Curing of Genetic Diseases
The primary use for human genetic engineering
concerns the curing of genetic diseases. But even this should be approached
cautiously. How far should our ability to
interfere in life be allowed to go? So far gene therapy is primarily tested for
debilitating and ultimately fatal diseases such as cystic fibrosis.
The first gene
therapy trial in humans corrected a life-threatening immune disorder in a
two-year-old girl who, now ten years later, is doing well. The gene therapy
required dozens of applications but has saved the family from a $60,000 per year
bill for necessary drug treatment without the gene therapy. Recently, sixteen
heart disease patients, who were literally waiting for death, received a
solution containing copies of a gene that triggers blood vessel growth by
injection straight into the heart. By growing new blood vessels around clogged
arteries, all sixteen showed improvement and six were completely relieved of
pain.
Once again, gene
therapy was performed as a last resort for a fatal condition. This seems to
easily fall within the medical boundaries of seeking to cure while at the same
time causing no harm. The problem will arise when gene therapy will be sought to
alleviate a condition that is less than life-threatening and perhaps considered
by some to simply be one of life's inconveniences, such as a gene that may offer
resistance to AIDS or may enhance memory. Such genes are known now and many are
suggesting that these goals will and should be available for gene therapy.
The most troublesome aspect of gene therapy has been
determining the best method of delivering the gene to the right cells and
enticing them to incorporate the gene into the cell's chromosomes. .
Most researchers have used crippled forms of viruses that naturally incorporate
their genes into cells. The entire field of gene therapy was dealt a severe
setback in September 1999 upon the death of Jesse Gelsinger who had undergone
gene therapy for an inherited enzyme deficiency at the
The same virus
vector had been used safely in thousands of other trials, but in this case,
after releasing stacks of clinical data and answering questions for two days,
the researchers didn't fully understand what had gone wrong. Other institutions
were also found to have failed to file immediate reports as required of serious
adverse events in their trials, prompting a congressional review. All this
should indicate that the answers to the technical problems of gene therapy have
not been answered and progress will be slowed as guidelines and reporting
procedures are studied and reevaluated.